Does your dog feel your pain?

August 19th, 2008 by Alex Dixon | Tags: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Laugh and the whole world laughs with you. Yawn, and so will your dog.

A recent study published in the journal Biology Letters found dogs yawn when humans do.

The finding suggests dogs may have the capacity for empathy.

In their experiment, researchers from the University of London yawned at 29 dogs. 72 percent yawned back — a higher frequency than humans, who typically mimic a yawn 45 to 60 percent of the time.

When the researcher simply opened his mouth wide, no dogs yawned.

Other animals capable of “facial mimicy” — imitating facial expressions — include orangutans and  chimps.

Facial mimicry is a rudimentary form of empathy.

Learning about Race

August 6th, 2008 by Jeremy Adam Smith | Tags: children, family, parenting | Leave a Comment »

Earlier this week I was sitting with my four-year-old son Liko watching teenagers play pick-up basketball in our neighborhood. This is a regular thing with us; Liko loves watching basketball.

“Daddy,” he asked thoughtfully, “why do only black kids play basketball?”

My heart skipped a beat and my stomach clenched with anxiety. I looked around the court: In fact, there was one young red-headed white girl and one middle-aged white guy, which I pointed out to him, but otherwise, yes, all the other players were black kids. (For the record, I should note that I’m white and my son is a mix of Caucasian and Asian ethnicities.)

Liko has grown up in a city, riding public transportation and visiting all parts of the Bay Area, and he’s accustomed to seeing people of many different races. But this was the first time he’d ever seemed to notice race and the first time he’d ever asked about it.

My split-second reaction was to panic. But I also instantly remembered an essay I had just helped edit for Greater Good — “Rubbing Off,” by child psychologist Allison Briscoe-Smith, is part of our new special issue on the science of prejudice.

In the issue, we explore new findings that show how our brains seem to be hardwired to notice and react negatively to racial difference–but we go beyond that to also explore strategies for overcoming prejudice.

Briscoe-Smith’s essay explains how kids learn about race and how their parents can foster tolerance. It’s a terrific article and my personal favorite in the issue: concrete, specific, and useful.

“Do kids even see or notice race?” asks Briscoe-Smith. “The answer is yes, they see and notice racial differences from a very young age, even in infancy.” By the age of three, she writes, kids will start sorting themselves into racial groups.

But Briscoe-Smith urges parents to not see their children as instinctive racists: “For children under the age of seven, race—or, rather, physical traits like skin color, language, and hair texture—are just signs that someone is in some way different from themselves, similar to gender or weight. It’s not unusual or unhealthy for kids to gravitate toward the familiar so early in life. Kids’ views only become prejudiced when they start linking these physical traits to flaws in character or behavior. We adults are the ones who ascribe malice to simply noticing racial differences.” She continues:

So in and of itself, recognizing racial difference is not a cause for alarm—quite the opposite, in fact. For years, studies have found that children who recognize these kinds of differences from an early age show a stronger general ability to identify subtle differences between categories like color, shape, and size—which, in turn, has been linked to higher performance on intelligence tests. Researcher Francis Aboud has found that children between the ages of four and seven who show this advanced ability to identify and categorize differences are actually less prejudiced. So parents, rest assured: When children notice and ask about racial differences, it’s a normal and healthy stage of development.

Whew. Remembering that lessened my anxiety about tackling Liko’s question.

But how to answer him? Briscoe-Smith notes that many well-intentioned parents opt for a policy of silence on the subject of race. “They assume that if they raise their children not to recognize racial differences, they’ll prevent them from becoming racist,” she writes.

Unfortunately, while parents are saying things like, “Look at the pretty boat!” in an effort to distract their children from the topic at hand, the kids are still noticing race and forming their own ideas on the subject–or getting their ideas from messages in the world around them.

“Instead of trying to ignore race, research suggests that parents should be more pro-active,” writes Briscoe-Smith. She continues:

They can tell their kids it’s OK to recognize and talk about racial differences while still communicating that it’s wrong to hold racial prejudices. My own research with 67 racially- and ethnically-diverse families, all of which had children under the age of seven, indicates that talking and answering kids’ questions about race may help them understand racial issues and become more tolerant. I found that the children of parents who talked more about race were better able to identify racism when they saw it, and were also more likely to have positive views about ethnic minorities. This was true for both the white families and the families of color in my study….

So parents, next time you’re on a playground and you hear your child say something that seems racially confused or even offensive, don’t be embarrassed. Don’t scold or shush. And don’t end the conversation with, “We don’t say things like that.” Instead, you might want to try, “Hmm, why don’t we talk about that some more?”

Liko looked at me and he expected an answer. I took a deep breath and said, “Well, it looks like a lot of black kids like playing basketball! Do you want to play basketball with them when you’re older?”

“Yeah!” he said.

Then he said: “Can I have an ice cream?”

And that was that. (Though I really need to read an article on how to say, “no, you can’t have ice cream right now,” in a way that doesn’t result in wheedling or weeping.) In the moment, I felt somehow inadequate, like I had missed some great opportunity to, I don’t know, plant the seed that will result in him one day becoming a perfectly tolerant human being.

But in retrospect, I see that I was just being a stupid adult. He was asking a simple and reasonable question, one of about two hundred he asked me that same day. But it put me on alert: There will be more questions on race in the future, and they may be a lot tougher. I hope I’m up to the job.

[Originally posted to my Mothering magazine blog.]

Community = Happiness?

August 5th, 2008 by Tom White | Tags: Jen ratio, cooperation, emotional literacy, empathy, family, happiness, prosocial behavior, self-transcendance, social capital, social connections, social exclusion | Leave a Comment »

Dick Meyer, NPR’s new editorial director of digital media, has authored a new book, Why We Hate Us: American Discontent in the New Millennium. In it he rails against how our consumer culture has overemphasized the role and importance of personal choice. He writes:

We accepted, naively, a bill of goods about how one forges an identity and happiness in life. And it doesn’t come in a vacuum — it comes in a community with the help of others.

The Birthday of Karl Menninger

July 23rd, 2008 by Tom White | Tags: Bystander, altruism, helping behavior, prosocial behavior | Leave a Comment »

I listen to Garrison Keillor’s Writer’s Almanac podcast and heard that Tuesday was the birthday of Karl Menninger, the man known as the “dean of American psychiatry,” born in Topeka, Kansas in 1893. When someone asked him what to do if a person feels he is about to have a nervous breakdown, Menninger replied,

“Lock up your house, go across the railroad tracks, find someone in need, and do something for them.”

He wrote more than a dozen books, including Love Against Hate (1959), Man Against Himself (1956), Whatever Became of Sin? (1988).

With Age, World Becomes “Mostly Good”

July 16th, 2008 by Alex Dixon | Tags: goodness, happiness | Leave a Comment »

A positive outlook on life isn’t generally associated with old age—on the contrary, the stereotypical “grumpy old man” may come to mind. But a new study suggests that as we get older, we increasingly think of the world as generally good, and those of us who do are happier.

The study, published earlier this year in the journal Psychology and Aging, examined roughly 2,000 people over a two-year period. Researchers Michael Poulin at the University of Michigan and Roxane Silver at UC Irvine gave participants several surveys that asked them about their well-being, how religious they were, and whether they thought the world and human nature were basically good.

Researchers compared the data with the participants’ age and found a correlation: The older the person, the more good they saw around them, and the better they felt emotionally. The results suggest that older adults–particularly those 50 years old and up–who see the world as “mostly good” are also likely to experience a general sense of well-being.

Not so for younger adults. For them, a positive outlook and well-being appear unrelated.

“In sum, our research implies that a positive view of the world may not be crucial for the young,” the researchers write. “But seeing the world as more good than bad and people as more trustworthy than not is a source of well-being for older adults.”

Another way TV hurts play

July 15th, 2008 by Jason Marsh | Tags: children, play | 1 Comment »

In Greater Good’s recent issue on play, our contributors, including psychologist David Elkind, discuss how kids are playing less and less. People are usually quick to blame TV, complaining that kids are playing less because they’re watching TV more.  

A new study suggests the truth may be even worse. The study, published in the July/August issue of Child Development, found that kids play significantly less if they’re simply in a room in which a TV is turned on, even if they’re not trying to watch it and even if it’s turned to adult programming. Under these conditions, the kids observed in the study, who were all three years old or younger, played for about five percent less time than when a TV wasn’t turned on.

What’s more, the reseachers found that when the kids did play with a TV on in the background, their play was less focused and lasted for shorter durations of time–about half as long.

“All of the concerns we have with children watching programming for children still apply to secondhand viewing. It distracts from the work of childhood, from play,” says New Orleans pediatrician Daniel Bronfin, quoted in a piece published today about the study by the HealthDay news service.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) already recommends that children two years old and younger not be exposed to any TV at all.

For more on contremporary threats to play–and suggestions for how to revive play–you can check out our recent play issue.

International Happiness Day

July 10th, 2008 by Jason Marsh | Tags: happiness | Leave a Comment »

Apparently, today is International Happiness Day. That may explain the extra spring in your step as you charged into work this morning, or the goofy grin you’ve been sporting since you rolled out of bed.

What? Your step has no spring, and your grin is no goofier than ususal? Seems you need to get with the Internationally Happy program. Learn more at www.internationalhappinessday.com.

This project bills itself as “a day in which people from all over the world intentionally choose to be happy while inspiring the happiness of others through simple acts of kindness, expressions of joy, gratitude, optimism, and forgiveness.” The description also invokes the “Law of Attraction”–of The Secret fame–making me a bit suspicious. But a few credible happiness researchers/authors seem to be on board, including Sonja Lyubomirsky and Tal Ben Shahar.

The event is meant to inspire people to recognize all they can do to intentionally make themselves happy, a concept supported by research, including Lyubomirsky’s. Activities for the day include joining (or starting) a Happiness Club and a “teleclass/video webinar” on how to lead a happier life.

Of course, here at the Greater Good Science Center, every day is a Happiness Day.

A Happier World?

July 2nd, 2008 by Jeremy Adam Smith | Tags: happiness | 1 Comment »

I’m fascinated by cross-national comparisons of happiness. On one hand, I’m incredulous that the measurements could mean anything, especially when I consider the cultural subjectivity of happiness and the methodological difficulties involved with gathering this kind of data on a worldwide scale.

On the other, I find there is a surprising amount of consistency in observer perceptions as well as different surveys. And, I admit it, I have the same geeky, goofy interest in lists of this type that many people do. Each suggests questions: Why should this place be happy? Why should that one be unhappy? The exercise is somehow meaningful, and even pleasurable.

A new study run by the University of Michigan, called the Happiness Index, will appear in the July 2008 issue of Perspectives on Psychological Science. It produced results remarkably similar to an another cross-national comparison by the University of Leicester’s Adrian G. White, which was drawn from a meta-analysis called the Happy Planet Index.

The Social Democratic countries of Northern Europe are shockingly happy (especially given that their weather is often lousy), with Denmark leading the way in the new study. The most miserable countries are hot and politically unstable–this year, troubled Zimbabwe sat at the bottom of the list. Given previous results, no surprises there.

The big surprise is that happiness seems to be rising around the world.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Astronishing Science of Father Involvement

June 19th, 2008 by Jeremy Adam Smith | Tags: children, family, gender roles, marriage, parenting, politics, work | Leave a Comment »

My esteemed colleague at the Greater Good Science Center, executive director Christine Carter, posted two very nice summaries of research into fatherhood over at her “happy kids” parenting blog, Half-Full.

The first asks that perennial question: Are Dads as Essential as Moms? Shockingly, the answer is yes:

* Research shows that the love and care of fathers is equally important for the health and well-being of children as mother-love. Really.

* Children are WAY better off when their relationship with their father is sensitive, secure, and supportive as well as close, nurturing, and warm.

* One of the biggest problems with divorce is that when a father moves out, the father-child relationship frequently falters. If he stays in the game, his kids will cope far better with the divorce.

The second asks the question: How can we get dads to be more involved? Christine’s answer: a mother’s support, a good co-parenting relationship, and reasonable work hours.

Research has revealed some other factors that drive father involvement: a father’s relationships with his own parents (did he have an involved father?) and in-laws (are they supportive of him?); timing of entry into the parental role (what pressures is he facing, especially at work?); and informal support systems such as playgroups and friendships (do other dads, as well as moms, put social pressure on him to be involved, through example or comments?); and the sex of the child. Fathers tend to be more involved with boys, which suggests to me that families with girls might try to amplify the other variables in play–for example, by setting aside special daddy-daughter time.

There’s another factor that I don’t think gets mentioned often enough: straight-out-of-the gate involvement with infant care. When a child is born, testosterone falls dramatically in men. In fact, studies by biologist Katherine Wynne-Edwards and others show that pregnancy, childbirth, and fatherhood trigger a range of little hormonal shifts in the male body—but only if the father is in contact with the baby and the baby’s mother, a crucial point. Read the rest of this entry »

Screening and discussion of Anyone and Everyone

June 7th, 2008 by Jason Marsh | Tags: children, events, parenting | Leave a Comment »

Longtime Greater Good subscriber Molleen Matsumura has alerted us to an upcoming documentary screening that may interest many of you in the SF Bay Area. The film is Anyone and Everyone, and it tells the stories of parents who have learned that their son or daughter is gay. Parents in the film “also talk about struggling with the pain of their sons and daughters dealing with not being accepted by relatives or friends, and being ostracized by religious congregations.”

The *free* screening will be this Tuesday, June 10, at the San Francisco LGBT Center at 1800 Market Street. Doors open at 5pm. The film will be followed by a discussion lasting until 8pm.  There will be educational resources available for attending classroom teachers. The screening is sponsored by KQED Education Network and several other organizations, including Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG).

To RSVP contact KQED at 415-553-2310 or CommunityEngagement@kqed.org.