Urban Evolution

By Jill Suttie | November 4, 2011 | 1 comment

A review of David Sloan Wilson's The Neighborhood Project: Using Evolution to Improve My City, One Block at a Time.

What can wasps and water striders tell us about urban renewal? A lot, according to David Sloan Wilson, an evolutionary biologist at SUNY Binghamton. You just need to understand the parallels between the evolution of their social systems and those of humans.

Wasps evolved to work cooperatively, with some members of the hive even forgoing reproduction in order to feed and protect the rest of the group. Water striders, on the other hand, are lone profiteers in the natural world, hunting by themselves and reproducing through sexual conquest.

In his new book, The Neighborhood Project, Wilson argues that humans have similar options: to become selfish loners or work together altruistically. He reasons that these traits develop in humans much the same way as in insects—in response to environmental pressures.

Wilson is the head of EvoS, a cross-disciplinary academic consortium at SUNY Binghamton dedicated to both teaching evolutionary theory and applying it to social as well as biological questions. Through a project he developed in his city, called “The Neighborhood Project,” he has tried to use EvoS’ work to improve Binghamton’s troubled neighborhoods—in particular, to improve its social climate, or “niceness.”

“If we can understand the environmental circumstances favoring niceness,” writes Wilson, “we can attempt to expand the niche for niceness and shrink the niche for nastiness.”

So far, he and his team of graduate students have done extensive mapping of Binghamton, exploring which Binghamton neighborhoods contain the most kind, helpful—or “pro-social”—behavior. To gauge niceness, they’ve used some creative measurements, such as the density of Halloween decorations in a neighborhood and the frequency with which residents picked up and delivered pieces of mail that Wilson’s team purposely dropped on the ground. They’ve also tested kids’ levels of pro-sociality using an instrument called the Developmental Assets Profile, which asks them to respond to statements like “I think it’s important to help people.”

When results from these tests were mapped onto the city of Binghamton, the team found that there was a strong correlation between a neighborhood’s “niceness” and the pro-sociality of the children living there, giving support to Wilson’s theory that environments influence individual characteristics.

However, while these and other studies by Wilson’s team have produced provocative findings—for example, that income level is not necessarily related to pro-sociality—it is far from clear whether evolutionary theory explains this connection any better than sociology or psychology might. Indeed, Wilson has many critics who charge that evolutionary theory does little to suggest exactly how we should tackle complex social issues.

Wilson recognizes that his work is subject to such criticism, but he dismisses these charges as the products of academic turf wars. Still, he spends a large part of the book offering detailed stories of how he’s converted others to his point of view—from researchers to graduate students to community activists—suggesting he’s more concerned by these criticisms than he lets on.

Unfortunately, a relatively small percentage of the book’s 400-plus pages chronicles the Binghamton Neighborhood Project, perhaps because the project is still in its infancy and its results, so far, are minimal. Wilson and his team have not yet found a reliable way to apply their knowledge toward improving Binghamton’s neighborhoods, despite trying to encourage cooperation through community garden projects and a design competition for the best neighborhood park.

Research often moves at a glacial pace, so perhaps Wilson can be forgiven for not having more to report. After all, wasps and striders took millions of years to develop their social orders. Wilson and his team may just need a little more time to affect the evolution of Binghamton.

Tracker Pixel for Entry

Greater Good wants to know:
Do you think this article will influence your opinions or behavior?

  • Very Likely

  • Likely

  • Unlikely

  • Very Unlikely

  • Not sure

About The Author

Jill Suttie, Psy.D., is Greater Good’s book review editor and a frequent contributor to the magazine.


Like this article?

Here's what you can do:


interesting article ..
so helpful

Asala mp3 | 10:59 am, November 11, 2011 | Link

blog comments powered by Disqus



Greater Good Events

The Greater Good Science Center Summer Institute for Educators 2017
Clark Kerr Campus, UC-Berkeley
Sunday, June 25 - Friday, June 30, 2017 OR Sunday, July 16 - Friday, July 21, 2017

The Greater Good Science Center Summer Institute for Educators 2017

The GGSC’s six-day Summer Institute equips education professionals with prosocial learning strategies, tools and processes that benefit both students and teachers.


Take a Greater Good Quiz!

How compassionate are you? How generous, grateful, or forgiving? Find out!


Watch Greater Good Videos

Jon Kabat-Zinn

Talks by inspiring speakers like Jon Kabat-Zinn, Dacher Keltner, and Barbara Fredrickson.


Greater Good Resources


Book of the Week

Roots of Empathy By Mary Gordon Mary Gordon explains how best to nurture empathy and social emotional literacy in all children—and thereby reduce aggression, antisocial behavior, and bullying.

Is she flirting with you? Take the quiz and find out.
"It is a great good and a great gift, this Greater Good. I bow to you for your efforts to bring these uplifting and illuminating expressions of humanity, grounded in good science, to the attention of us all."  
Jon Kabat-Zinn

Best-selling author and founder of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction program

thnx advertisement