Arguing from the Heart

By Kasey Crispin | October 2, 2007 | 0 comments

According to some new research, it seems that the way married couples argue is more important than the content of those arguments. In today's New York Times, Tara Parker-Pope reports on a few studies that have found a link between the way spouses argue and their risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and other illnesses.

Parker-Pope cites a recent study led by Elaine D. Eaker, an epidemiologist in Maryland, who surveyed nearly 4,000 men and women about how they act when they argue with their spouse. Did they vent their feelings or keep them bottled up (known as self-silencing)? Thirty-two percent of the men reported bottling up their feelings in a fight, while only 23 percent of women reported the same.

Then Eaker and her colleagues monitored the study participants for the next ten years. They found that women who self-silenced were four times as likely to die during that period than their more verbal counterparts. Keeping quiet for men, however, showed no apparent connection to their health.

Parker-Pope also mentions a similar study conducted by Timothy W. Smith and his colleagues at the University of Utah. In that study, the researchers videotaped married couples' interactions in order to see how the emotional tone of their discussions was associated with their risk of coronary heart disease. After being given stressful topics to discuss, such as finances, the couples' remarks were coded according to how warm or hostile they were. The results showed that among both men and women, arguing style proved to be a strong predictor of their risk for heart disease—even more than cholesterol levels or smoking.

Even more interesting is the way different arguing styles affected men and women differently. Parker-Pope explains:

The level of warmth or hostility had no effect on a man's heart health. For a man, heart risk increased if disagreements with his wife involved a battle for control. And it didn't matter whether he or his wife was the one making the controlling comments. An example of a controlling argument style showed up in one video of a man arguing with his wife about money. "You really should just listen to me on this," he told her.

Also notable is that both studies found that responses about personal satisfaction with the marriage did not correlate with any health risks. So that makes me wonder: Can these unhealthy habits be changed if spouses don't even recognize that something's wrong?

Tracker Pixel for Entry
 
 
 
About The Author

Kasey Crispin is a Greater Good editorial assistant.

  

Like this article?

Here's what you can do:

Donate
 
  
 
Leave Comment

Please fill out the fields below to post your comment. If you're a GGSC member, you can avoid always having to complete these fields. Why wait? Become a member today.







Number of characters remaining: 4000



Are you a human?
Retype the word you see here.


 

Most...

  
  
  

 
How to Keep Your Child Safe (and Happy) Online, Part 1

How to Keep Your Child Safe (and Happy) Online, Part 1

May 14, 2012

Tips for helping kids navigate the social media minefield

 
  
Is she flirting with you? Take the quiz and find out.

Greater Good Live

  

When is Stress Good for You?

When is Stress Good for You?

Combining wit with deep knowledge, Robert Sapolsky explains the optimal amount of stress.

Watch
 

The Greater Good Guide to Mindfulness

The Greater Good Guide to Mindfulness

This invaluable resource, a special benefit for GGSC members, offers insight into what mindfulness is, why it’s important, and how to teach it.

Get the Guide
 

Pathways to Gratefulness

The Palace of Fine Arts, San Francisco
June 23rd 2012, 10am-5pm
Pathways to Gratefulness

Network for Grateful Living presents a summit geared at awakening the practice of gratefulness and grateful living in all of us.

» All Events

 
  
image

Greater Good Sections

Sponsors

The Quality of Life Foundation logo Special thanks to

The Quality of Life Foundation for its support of the Greater Good Science Center